After NBA, Modi also opposes panel on Sardar Sarovar

Demands that MoEF’s advisory committee to ascertain compliance with environmental standards be scrapped

GN Bureau | May 4, 2010



After Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA) cried foul over ministry of environment and forests’ new advisory panel on Sardar Sarovar Project, Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi has also opposed the formation of the committee, albeit for different reasons.
In a letter handed over to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh on Monday, Modi demanded that the MoEF’s order for formation of the committee, which is tasked with examining the adequacy of the plans and schedule for implementation to ensure ‘pari-passu’ compliance with environmental safeguard measures, be revoked.

“Decision of the Ministry of Environment and Forest taken on 28th April 2010 is not at all in accordance with the present provisions of Narmada Yojana and with the order of the Supreme Court on 20th Oct 2000,” says the letter.
Modi insisted that forming such a high level committee would be contrary to the numerous decisions taken by other central bodies in the past, and the move would further perplex the situation and “pass the negative impacts”.

“Narmada Control Authority has a complete monitoring set-up and environmental sub-group is capable enough to take any step related to the project; there is no need of any other independent body to take decision in this issue,” the letter said.

Last week, NBA had objected to the new advisory committee, primarily on the grounds that it would bypass Devendra Pandey Committee's interim report that showed that Sardar Sarovar project did not have sufficient plans for compliance with environmental safeguards.
“The ministry has full powers…to straight away issue stop work notices. Instead, it is forming one committee after the other,” NBA leader Medha Patkar was quoted as saying in a news-report.

NBA also objected to the membership of the committee, which includes Yoginder K. Alagh, one of the planners of the project and a known supporter of the dam.
“He was a party to the same plans which are being analyzed. We cannot expect objective analysis from someone who has had an interest in the project from the beginning,” Patkar was quoted as saying.
 

Comments

 

Other News

Mofussils: Musings from the Margins

Provincials: Postcards from the Peripheries By Sumana Roy Aleph Book Company, 320 pages, Rs 899 Sumana Roy’s latest work, like its p

How to promote local participation in knowledge sharing

Knowledge is a powerful weapon to help people and improve their lives. Knowledge provides the tools to understand society, solve problems, and empower people to overcome challenges and experience personal growth. Limited sources were available to attain information on the events in and arou

‘The Civil Servant and Super Cop: Modesty, Security and the State in Punjab’

Punjabi Centuries: Tracing Histories of Punjab Edited by Anshu Malhotra Orient BlackSwan, 404 pages, Rs. 2,150

What really happened in ‘The Scam That Shook a Nation’?

The Scam That Shook a Nation By Prakash Patra and Rasheed Kidwai HarperCollins, 276 pages, Rs 399 The 1970s were a

Report of India’s G20 Task Force on Digital Public Infrastructure released

The final ‘Report of India’s G20 Task Force on Digital Public Infrastructure’ by ‘India’s G20 Task Force on Digital Public Infrastructure for Economic Transformation, Financial Inclusion and Development’ was released in New Delhi on Monday. The Task Force was led by the

How the Great War of Mahabharata was actually a world war

Mahabharata: A World War By Gaurang Damani Sanganak Prakashan, 317 pages, Rs 300 Gaurang Damani, a Mumbai-based el

Visionary Talk: Amitabh Gupta, Pune Police Commissioner with Kailashnath Adhikari, MD, Governance Now


Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter