Water, wisdom and Wasmo: a learning journey

Old women are contributing their lifelong savings: can there be any bigger proof of community participation?

anilkgupta

Anil K Gupta | February 28, 2011



I recently met a number of village community leaders and innovators who had achieved remarkable results in collaboration with the Water and Sanitation Management Organisation in Gujarat in dealing with the problems of drinking water and sanitation.

If through transparency, honesty and self-critical attitude, public officials can achieve so much in this programme, then lessons need to be learned so that other programmes can also benefit from similar processes. It is a pity that NREGA funds cannot be transferred to Wasmo for implementation: we could have avoided so much corruption and misuse and ensured much higher productivity through genuine community participation.

Let me recount some grassroots innovations which made us aware of the range of creative responses communities have shown in dealing with variable topographies, water level, pressure, distribution requirements and so on.

Where else will you see an old widow, Doodhiben in Bhavnagar district, contributing her lifelong savings for the creation of a common water supply facility, or another lady, Ambaben, donating for a similar purpose the amount she had saved for her last rites?management

When it was realised by some farmers that the guidelines provided for making a chamber for controlling water supply underground invariably lead to water collection which led to dirtiness and mosquito breeding, they decided to make a chamber above the ground. The programme managers did not have a problem with that. In another village, the source of water and the pump were eight km away from the village, and going there every time power came would have been tiresome. Why not use the mobile phone switch on/off system along with a status report on whether power was available or not, and if so in how many phases? The whole village could send an SMS to that water supply phone and get to know when the water would be supplied. All automatic.

We had a similar innovation in the National Innovation Foundation (NIF) database but this one was surely meeting local needs well and was developed by local people through their own ingenuity. In another place, the local community developed water supply points ensuring that every household in every locality got water at the same pressure. Even in this, to calibrate the pressure, they would keep a regulatory point which was sealed after testing it for 15 days. Nobody could change the pressure or add a water point or cheat the system. The additional cost of this system was over Rs 1 lakh, but the equity does not come cheap.

I wish various developmental programmes study the way people have decided to pay more amount (as much as Rs 600 per household per year or Rs 14 per capita per month in some villages) for water. Let us find out how much we pay in cities, how many housing societies deliver water at the same pressure to everybody.

There are many more innovative examples of water conservation, distribution and utilisation which we are studying to draw lessons for participatory development. It is not for nothing that the Rajasthan assembly speaker came along with MLAs and chief water supply engineers to study how Gujarat had done this miracle.

That also shows when best practices will be learned across party political lines, nothing will come in the way of overcoming the shame of this nation, which cannot provide safe drinking water to thousands of villages after so many years of independence. Gujarat will have solved this problem soon and for good.

But on the sanitation front, there is still a long way to go. While thousands of toilets have been built, there is still a need to persuade people to understand that microbial load in water in many places is very high because of contamination of catchments. We need to create a consciousness that every drop of water counts. Not one tap should leak, not one drop should drip. Every village community has to clean the catchments from where water drains into the water body before rains. And reverse osmosis (RO) water needs to be re-mineralised, otherwise there will be a major micro-nutrient crisis and public health problem.

Comments

 

Other News

The women India doesn`t count enough

She runs a tailoring shop from a single room in her house. Every morning she stitches school uniforms, answers queries on WhatsApp, collects payments through UPI and orders fabric online. Officially, she still belongs to India`s informal economy. Yet her enterprise is no longer disconnected from the formal

“Cancer is just a mind game”

Dr. Ananda Shankar Jayant, a Padma Shri awardee, inspired audiences for decades through her mastery of Bharatanatyam and Kuchipudi. But it was her journey through cancer that taught some of life`s most powerful lessons in courage and resilience.

Why Swami Vivekananda is the pathfinder for our times

Swami Vivekananda for Our Times  Edited and compiled by Rajiv Sikri, with Introduction by S. Gurumurthy Rupa Publications, 552 pages, Rs 695  

Five ways to realise the potential of India’s handicraft and handloom sector

India`s economic ambitions are increasingly defined by the industries of the future. Semiconductors, electronics, artificial intelligence and advanced manufacturing dominate policy conversations. Yet one of India`s largest employment-intensive sectors continues to occupy a surprisingly marginal place in ec

Beyond toilets: Why open defecation persists in rural India

Despite the awareness campaigns on sanitation across India, open defecation (OD) is practised openly and widely in both rural and urban areas. Research shows that rural respondents are well aware of the negative impacts of OD, yet this awareness does not lead to toilet construction or use. In rural North I

What unpaid nation builders want from policymakers

The Supreme Court recently described homemakers as “nation builders” and fixed a notional monthly income of Rs 30,000 for them in motor accident compensation cases. The judgment was not about wages. It was about compensation. Yet it inadvertently raised a larger economic question: If a homemake





Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter