Please talk to us more Prime Minister, talk to us a damned lot more
Accountability is not a once-in-three-years media jamboree
| new delhi | May 22 2010
View Image
On Monday, May 24, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh will address a press conference in New Delhi to unveil the report card of his government’s performance in its first year. The press conference is going to be unlike any other before it. It will not be limited to Delhi journalists. Reporters from Mumbai, Chennai, Kolkata, Bangalore, Hyderabad and Lucknow will be present by video to pose questions to the prime minister. Maybe a few questions will be taken from foreign capitals too. According to Harish Khare, the information adviser to PM, about 250 news channels and 1,500 print journalists will cram Vigyan Bhawan, the venue.
Admittedly, to use a common television phrase, it doesn’t get bigger than this. This is quite the manna from heaven for any journalist, so why is it that you sense a lack of admiration or gratefulness in our mood? Because this will be the first time in three long years and only the second in his six longer years in office that the prime minister will have deigned to subject himself to open scrutiny by the media. His interviews to Indian media have been few and far between while he has been generous with foreign media.
So we have effectively had a prime minister who is not only thought to be a puppet but a puppet on mute. For a government that boasts of ushering in the Right to Information era in this country, that’s a dismal record. World over heads of government have well established and structured interactions with their peoples through the media. The president of the United States talks every day to the nation through the White House spokesperson and comes on himself regularly to face the media. These interactions only increase, not decrease, when in the midst of a national emergency, controversy or crucial debate.
These leaders talk to the media not to help it fill space but because it is their duty to reach the people on whose behalf they govern. We love to refer to the iron curtain of China, but ask any reporter assigned the PMO beat what opaqueness in administration means. For most part covering the prime minister means waiting out on the road outside his residence or office looking desperately for a byte like a hungry dog looks for a bone.
Of course, prime ministers are busy people and can’t be talking to the press all the time. That is why they have press advisors, mostly senior journalists from the print media. Their job is ordinarily understood as having to facilitate the media’s interaction with the prime minister or establish a routine for giving out information on his/her behalf. On the contrary, they busy themselves exclusively with planting favourable stories in a media that is hungry for any crumbs from the PMO. The media advisors themselves become the great wall of China between the media and the prime minister. They think nothing of the instant metamorphosis from journalists seeking information to information advisors blocking information.
There are three people who matter most in the country and all three of them hardly speak. They do not allow themselves to be questioned on their beliefs, their core concerns, their crucial decisions, how and why they arrived at those decisions, etc. Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi are politicians and can at least claim they talk to people directly and don’t need the media as middleman. But the prime minister is duty-bound to tell the nation why, for example, he decided to sack Shashi Tharoor or decided not to sack Jairam Ramesh or why he dare not touch A Raja or reprimand Mamata Banerjee. Or why in three years his government has not written to the Swiss authorities asking for the details of the billions of billions of slush money stashed away there.
In the absence of first hand information from his office, all reportage of his work and thinking is hearsay. Right to Information does not mean the people of this country come in with their RTI queries only after the event is dead and done with. A crucial component of right to information is the duty to reveal, duty to be answerable, sometimes even as things are unfolding.
So when on Monday and later you are told that this government has done something out of the ordinary by presenting its report card, don’t be swayed. Accountability is not a once-in-three-years media jamboree. It is being open every day of every year in office. Sorry prime minister, we cannot be grateful for the crumbs that you throw at us. Please talk to us more, prime minister. Talk to us a damned lot more.
why we wana always debate rather then put the wrong and violation of every indian citizens and all human beings fundamental rights into the forum of law? Whether due to only corruptions? or We all are being part of corruption?
Looking at the maturity level of most of our TV journalists - why are you surprised? See the coverage of the AI crash today as a perfect example of stupid questions and totally immature handling of a crisis situation. I think the PM has better things to do than present himself regularly in front of a bunch of electronic media vultures who's only aim in life is to maximize their channel's TVRs. Asking silly questions to embarrass him is their way of showcasing their journalistic talents. I think the rest of the country is better off without that fiasco on a regular basis.
You are bang right. PM is duty bound to communicate with his people on every issue of national importance. But our politicians with fat egos always treat us with contempt and don’t find it necessary to share anything with the have-nots.
The much awaited press conference will hardly make us any wiser , simply because our PM will dole out crumbs only.
Rightly said. But it also shows deeper malaise of India. Here people are afraid of communication (in public) because our education system does not permit us to become communicator. We are more like a solo individual character. India is also a not good place to get public information unless you are close to a bureaucrat. Even in private places, the top level put every effort to store information.
Just imagine a decade back, then External Affairs Minister Jaswant Singh had a eight round discussion with US Deputy Secretary of State Strobe Talbott. Where did we get more information from. It was Talbott not the MEA or Jaswant.
Coming on to more recent one. When Sharm-el-Sheikh fiasco happened. Indian media got more information from their Pakistani counterparts then from our ministers and bureaucrats. Talk to any Pakistani delegates, you get to know so much from them.
Lastly, in India, it has never happened that our PMs being caught on television rehearsing before addressing the media. Remember 2003, when Iraq War happened and BBC showed few seconds of clips showing the US President George Bush rehearsing just before his address to media. Or even two years back, when Pakistani state Television - PTV ran the live footage of its President Asif Ali Zardari's gaffe after the Marriott hotel blast as he was still rehearsing.
So as our Prime Minister Manmohan Singh is addressing on Monday, I am more interested to know how much is he doing proper homework before his address. Let's hope he is not impromptu, he is well prepared.
Its a very nice piece especially at a time the list of 'holy cows' beyond the pale of media scrutiny (Sonia and Rahul Gandhi, Sachin Tendulkar readily come to mind)is steadily growing. But Manmohan's 'wimpy' stint as PM cannot be separated from the rapidly devaluing office of the Prime Minister. The more serious dilemma is: those with de facto power (Sonia Gandhi) don't hold constitutionally responsible positions, and those who hold such positions (Manmohan Singh) have no powers.
Post new comment