Gadkari betrays Parivar's shallow intellect, exit certain

Comparing Vivekanand and Dawood indicates how saffron fold looks at world

GN Bureau | November 5, 2012


Nitin Gadkari
Nitin Gadkari

The quality of the prevalent discourse on nationalism within the Sangh Parivar has inadvertently been betrayed by BJP president Nitin Gadkari when he put at par the intelligence quotient of Swami Vivekanand and fugitive gangster Dawood Ibrahim. As per Gadkari's science, though both had the same IQ level, their paths were different.

Obviously it would be naive to dismiss Gadkari's formulation as indiscretion of a dim-witted leader who developed the pretence of an intellectual. Far from it, his statement is indicative of the intellectual culture that supports the argument of Hindu nationalism. Surprisingly, such arguments are discreetly used in the Sangh Parivar to bolster the Hindutva cause.

What Gadkari has said in Bhopal conforms to the RSS's world view. His argument perfectly matches the intellectual rigour applied within the saffron fold. But what Gadkari's slip of tongue has done is an unpardonable sin: to reveal the nature and quality of a subversive culture which exists within the Parivar. Gadkari's articulation would ultimately prove to be his political nemesis. As of now his days are numbered -- not because of his involvement in unethical business practices. He would pay the price for letting a family secret slip away in public arena.

According to an agency report, Gadkari said at a function in Bhopal Sunday night, "In psychology, we measure IQ levels of people... But it depends from person to person, in which area they use their intelligence.

"As per psychology if we can compare the IQ level of Swami Vivekanand and that of Dawood Ibrahim, then it could have been almost the same. But Vivekanand used it in nation building, brotherhood and spiritualism while Dawood used that in excelling in crime world," he said.

As the statement ignited controversy on Monday, Gadkari has said he was misquoted.
 

Comments

 

Other News

Gandhian movement after Gandhi failed: Ram Guha

The Gandhian movement in India, after Gandhi’s death, failed, says Ramachandra Guha, and blames Vinoba Bhave for it. But the movement found new, fertile grounds around the world and succeeded in bringing about a change in South Africa, the US and elsewhere. It is high time it returned home. Of cour

When religion, politics and Bollywood come together

Tavleen Singh, noted journalist and political commentator, has turned to fiction, with her debut novel ‘The Actor’ (HaperCollins India). Set in the near future, it has a superstar, Amit Singh, turning to politics, when the political landscape is dominated by prime minister Guru Gaynendraj

Cabinet approves setting up of Integrated Transport & Logistics Authority

The union cabinet, chaired by prime minister Narendra Modi, on Tuesday approved the setting up of a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV), called Integrated Transport & Logistics Authority (ITLA), to strengthen research, planning, appraisal, monitoring and impact assessment within the broad domains of Transp

Why foundational literacy and numeracy is key to school education

Foundational Literacy and Numeracy (FLN) are often described as the building blocks of education. Yet, their significance goes well beyond a child’s ability to read a sentence, write a response or solve a basic mathematical problem. These foundational skills shape how children understand the world,

When police data becomes the algorithm

For decades, policing has followed a familiar sequence: a crime occurs, the police respond, an investigation produces records and those records become part of the institutional memory of the criminal justice system. Artificial intelligence is beginning to alter that sequence. Instead of merely recording

Before India voted, the framers worried about the referee

“We are making a Constitution forever and not only for today.” Shibban Lal Saksena said this in the Constituent Assembly on June 15, 1949. He was warning that a ruling party might one day choose a loyalist to run India’s elections. Seventy-seven years later, the Supreme Court is wrestli

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter