Magazine Subscription
  • Home
  • News
  • Views
  • GovNow
  • GovNext
  • Login
  • Register
Home › News › Chautala’s delayed conviction best case for fast courts

Chautala’s delayed conviction best case for fast courts

Delhi’s trial court has taken more than 13 years to do this
Prasanna Mohanty | New Delhi | January 22 2013
  • http://governancenow.com/sites/default/files/IMG_4123.gif
  • http://governancenow.com/sites/default/files/IMG_4070.gif
« previous | next »
View
 
 Image Gallery

Conviction and sentencing of former Haryana chief minister Om Prakash Chautala and his accomplices by a Delhi trial court - for gross irregularities committed in appointment of junior basic trained (JBT) teachers - may be a welcome development, what is clearly not is the time the judiciary has taken to reach this stage.

The scam was first exposed in 1999. The trial court has, thus, taken more than 13 years to convict and sentence him. By no means, this is the end of the judicial process. Chautala now has the option of approaching the high court and then, the supreme court, before he actually serves out the sentence. That may take another decade or more. Who knows?

Also read: Chautala, son get 10 years in jail: supporters are angry

That is why union minister Kamal Nath was right when, earlier this month, he proposed fast-track courts for politicians under cloud too (in addition to the fast tracks for rape cases that the Delhi high court has proposed).

Needless to say, quick justice is in everybody’s interest. The courts get to decide more cases, de-clogging the system in the process. Quick justice reinforces people’s faith in the judicial system. The politician gets justice, one way or the other, without having to spend years in litigation. The general public too wouldn’t have to wait indefinitely to see the guilty politician punished or the innocent one cleared of doubts and accusations.

Kamal Nath proposed amendments in the law so that serious criminal cases against politicians could be tried and decided in six months. The government and the judiciary may have ignored it so far, but it is worth considering.

Related stories

Stories you might like

Sheila Dikshit and the price of political publicity
Final Coalgate verdict: SC wants dour agents to quiz, not relate
Buzz in corridors: PAC to audit RD ministry schemes, empanelment of 1980 batch begins
Have Sonia and Manmohan actually made up?
Dear BJP, UPA could be worse than you think

More stories in this section

IPL spot fixing: Mumbai cops are right in not giving CSK boss more time
Buzz in corridors: PAC to audit RD ministry schemes, empanelment of 1980 batch begins
Delhi Police chief can stay off IPL but his logic's a bit awry

Author

prasanna's picture
Prasanna Mohanty
Deputy Editor, Governance Now

 

In Other Stories

  • Playing hookey with hockey
  • Ordinance to plug hurdle in Metro, games project for CWG in delhi.
  • National Knowledge Network coming
  • Kapil Sibal
  • DK: Back of the Beyond
  • Putting Home in Order
  • 'Make Intelligence Accountable'
  • No arbitration for tribunal members
  • Penalty for frivolous petition
  • Opposition stalls bills

In This Section

  • Most Emailed
  • Most Popular
  • Most Commented
  • Fragility of regulatory reform...
  • Mixed signals from Indian economy...
  • Union Budget: A comedy of errors...
  • An open application to Prannoy Roy for post o...
anna hazare Bihar BJP CBI china congress corruption Delhi e-governance facebook Gujarat High Court India jairam ramesh Kapil Sibal Karnataka Maharashtra Manmohan Singh Mumbai Narendra Modi parliament P Chidambaram Pranab Mukherjee prime minister rajya sabha RTI Sonia Gandhi supreme court UPA Uttar Pradesh
more tags
Copyright ©2010 Governance Now
  • Copyright Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Help
  • Advertise with us
  • Careers
  • Contact Us
  • Sitemap